Home Coronavirus The More We Learn About Dr. Fauci, the Worse it Gets

The More We Learn About Dr. Fauci, the Worse it Gets

by Paul Ebeling

#Fauci #Collins #DCD #NIH #NIAID#science #virus #Omicron #lockdowns #harvard #stanford #oxford

This government figurehead has had 2 yrs in the limelight, urging people to “follow the science,” which he regularly equates to his own shifting opinions”— Paul Ebeling

Recently, another cache of e-Mails obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) now reveals Fauci and his boss, National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins, colluded behind the scenes to silence dissenting views on the lockdowns.

  • On 4 October 2020, 3 medical professors: Martin Kulldorff from Harvard, Sunetra Gupta from Oxford and Jay Bhattacharya from Stanford launched the Great Barrington Declaration, which called for focused protection of high-risk individuals rather than the continuation of blanket lockdowns
  • As support of the declaration rapidly spread, Dr. Fauci and Mr. Collins discussed how they could stop the call for a sane, science-based approach. In an e-Mail to Dr. Fauci, Mr. Collins wrote, “There needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises
  • The e-Mails between them are the smoking gun showing that it is they who are waging war against science
  • Despite having a combined annual budget of $58-B, and a combined staff of 31,000, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the NIH/NIAID have not yet conducted an actual study to determine how natural immunity stacks up against the COVID vaccine, begging the Big Q: do they not want to learn the answer?

Disturbingly, there is now evidence suggesting Omicron might be yet another lab creation.

FACT: The closest genetic sequences to Omicron date back to mid-2020. It does not seem to belong to any of the evolutionary branches that have emerged since. 

There’s no precedent for this oddity occurring in nature.

Omicron is said to have some 50 mutations from the original Alpha strain, many of which specifically allow it to circumvent COVID shot-induced antibody defenses.

According to molecular biologist and cancer geneticist Philip Buckhaults, PhD, Omicron has 25 nonsynonymous and only one synonymous spike mutation compared to its most recent common ancestor (AV.1). Were it a natural occurrence, that ratio ought to be somewhere between 25 to 50 and 25 to 100.

Unless and until we end up with conclusive proof of its origin, we need to keep all options open, and that includes the possibility of Omicron being cooked up in a lab from a previous strain.

A plausible theory is that scientists enabled an early SARS-CoV-2 variant to build antibody resistance, possibly by passaging them through human or humanized cell lines in the presence of convalescent plasma.

Dr. Fauci and Mr. Collins are not alone, and not even close to the Top of the technocratic food chain, however, they play very important roles. It’s time to see them for who and what they are, and demand that they be held to account for their actions.

Have a healthy, happy Christmas week, Keep the Faith!

You may also like


Your Trusted Source for Capital Markets & Related News

© 2023 LiveTradingNews.com – For The Traders, By The Traders – All Right Reserved.

The information contained on this website shall not be construed as (i) an offer to purchase or sell, or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell, any securities or services, (ii) investment, legal, business or tax advice or an offer to provide such advice, or (iii) a basis for making any investment decision. An offering may only be made upon a qualified investor’s receipt not via this website of formal materials from the Knightsbridge an offering memorandum and subscription documentation (“offering materials”). In the case of any inconsistency between the information on this website and any such offering materials, the offering materials shall control. Securities shall not be offered or sold in any jurisdiction in which such offer or sale would be unlawful unless the requirements of the applicable laws of such jurisdiction have been satisfied. Any decision to invest in securities must be based solely upon the information set forth in the applicable offering materials, which should be read carefully by qualified investors prior to investing. An investment with Knightsbridge is not suitable or desirable for all investors; investors may lose all or a portion of the capital invested. Investors may be required to bear the financial risks of an investment for an indefinite period of time. Qualified investors are urged to consult with their own legal, financial and tax advisors before making any investment. Knightsbridge is a private investment firm that offers investment services to Qualified Investors, Members and Institutions ONLY. Qualified Investors are defined as individuals who have met those Qualifications in the relevant jurisdictions. Members are defined as individuals who have been accepted into the Knightsbridge membership program. Institutions are defined as entities such as banks, pension funds, and hedge funds. If you are not a Qualified Investor, Member or Institution, you are not eligible to invest with Knightsbridge. All investments involve risk, and there is no guarantee of profit. You may lose some or all of your investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Knightsbridge is not a registered investment advisor, and this disclaimer should not be construed as investment advice. Please consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. By accessing this website, you agree to the terms of this disclaimer. Thank you for your interest in Knightsbridge.