Home PoliticsAmerica Gensler Leads the Democrats Anti-Crypto Push Bitcoin ETFs May Go Offshore
bitcoin shayne heffernan

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair, Gary Gensler, continued to criticize industry practices in a public statement, even as the SEC faces legal battles with cryptocurrency firms.

If the SEC continues to block Bitcoin ETFs in the US, it is likely that more and more asset managers will look to establish Bitcoin ETFs in other countries. This would make it easier for investors outside of the US to invest in Bitcoin.

It is important to note that the SEC has not yet made a final decision on whether or not to approve Bitcoin ETFs. However, Gensler has expressed some skepticism about Bitcoin ETFs in the past. He has said that he is concerned about the volatility of Bitcoin and the potential for fraud in the Bitcoin market.

If the SEC does not approve Bitcoin ETFs in the US, it would be a setback for the Bitcoin industry. However, it is likely that the Bitcoin industry would find ways to adapt. For example, asset managers could establish Bitcoin ETFs in other countries, or they could develop new investment products that would give investors exposure to Bitcoin, this would be damaging to the US Economy.

Gensler, has made a number of statements about Bitcoin, some of which could be interpreted as being anti-Bitcoin. For example, he has said that Bitcoin is a “speculative asset” that is “not suitable for most investors.” He has also said that Bitcoin is “used in a lot of illicit activity.”

Gensler refrained from revealing the SEC’s plans regarding spot bitcoin Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) following a recent legal setback.

In his testimony before the House Financial Services Committee, Gensler maintained his critical stance on how digital asset companies handle customer funds, emphasizing the risks associated with commingling assets.

He also mentioned that the SEC has not yet decided on its course of action in response to a judge’s ruling that required the agency to reconsider its position on spot bitcoin ETFs.

Gensler stated, “It’s still an active consideration of the commission,” and added, “We have great respect for the courts.”

In August, a judge in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals instructed the SEC to reevaluate its stance on bitcoin ETF applications, deeming the agency’s rejection in the Grayscale Investments case “arbitrary and capricious.” Gensler’s testimony did not provide specifics on the SEC’s next steps or timeline for action.

The congressional hearing also covered topics beyond cryptocurrency, including concerns about a potential government shutdown and whether the SEC is overly focused on issues like climate change. The hearing highlighted partisan divisions, with Democrats offering support for Gensler, while Republicans criticized his actions.

There are a number of Democratic politicians who have expressed opposition to Bitcoin. Some of the most notable examples include:

  • Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
  • Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
  • Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA)
  • Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-MI)
  • Representative Stephen Lynch (D-MA)

There are a number of Republican politicians who have expressed opposition to Bitcoin. Some of the most notable examples include:

  • Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX)
  • Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO)
  • Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA)
  • Representative Patrick McHenry (R-NC)
  • Representative Tom Emmer (R-MN)

These politicians have raised a variety of concerns about Bitcoin, including its environmental impact, its volatility, and its use in illicit activities. They have also argued that Bitcoin is not a safe investment for ordinary Americans.

It is important to note that not all Democrats are opposed to Bitcoin. Some Democrats, such as Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), have expressed support for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. However, the Democrats listed above are among the most prominent Democratic voices who have spoken out against Bitcoin.

In addition to the politicians listed above, there are also a number of Democratic-aligned think tanks and advocacy groups that have expressed opposition to Bitcoin. For example, the Center for American Progress and the Consumer Federation of America have both published reports criticizing Bitcoin.

Overall, it is clear that there is a significant amount of opposition to Bitcoin within the Democratic Party.

Shayne Heffernan

You may also like


Your Trusted Source for Capital Markets & Related News

© 2023 LiveTradingNews.com – For The Traders, By The Traders – All Right Reserved.

The information contained on this website shall not be construed as (i) an offer to purchase or sell, or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell, any securities or services, (ii) investment, legal, business or tax advice or an offer to provide such advice, or (iii) a basis for making any investment decision. An offering may only be made upon a qualified investor’s receipt not via this website of formal materials from the Knightsbridge an offering memorandum and subscription documentation (“offering materials”). In the case of any inconsistency between the information on this website and any such offering materials, the offering materials shall control. Securities shall not be offered or sold in any jurisdiction in which such offer or sale would be unlawful unless the requirements of the applicable laws of such jurisdiction have been satisfied. Any decision to invest in securities must be based solely upon the information set forth in the applicable offering materials, which should be read carefully by qualified investors prior to investing. An investment with Knightsbridge is not suitable or desirable for all investors; investors may lose all or a portion of the capital invested. Investors may be required to bear the financial risks of an investment for an indefinite period of time. Qualified investors are urged to consult with their own legal, financial and tax advisors before making any investment. Knightsbridge is a private investment firm that offers investment services to Qualified Investors, Members and Institutions ONLY. Qualified Investors are defined as individuals who have met those Qualifications in the relevant jurisdictions. Members are defined as individuals who have been accepted into the Knightsbridge membership program. Institutions are defined as entities such as banks, pension funds, and hedge funds. If you are not a Qualified Investor, Member or Institution, you are not eligible to invest with Knightsbridge. All investments involve risk, and there is no guarantee of profit. You may lose some or all of your investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Knightsbridge is not a registered investment advisor, and this disclaimer should not be construed as investment advice. Please consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. By accessing this website, you agree to the terms of this disclaimer. Thank you for your interest in Knightsbridge.