ESG: A Disaster in the Making
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing has become increasingly popular in recent years. Investors are looking for ways to invest their money in companies that are making a positive impact on the world. However, there is a growing concern that ESG investing is actually a disaster in the making.
In a June 10 Tweet, Elon Musk, the embodiment of the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, declared that “ESG is the devil.”
There are a number of reasons why ESG investing is a problem. First, ESG investing is often based on subjective criteria. There is no single definition of what constitutes an ESG investment, and different investors use different criteria. This can lead to confusion and greenwashing, where companies make false or misleading claims about their ESG credentials.
Second, ESG investing can be expensive. ESG funds often have high fees, which can eat into returns. Third, ESG investing can be discriminatory. Some ESG funds exclude companies that operate in certain industries, such as fossil fuels or defense. This can limit investment opportunities and lead to higher prices for consumers.
Finally, ESG investing can be ineffective. There is no evidence that ESG investing actually leads to better environmental or social outcomes. In fact, some studies have shown that ESG investing can actually have negative consequences. For example, a study by the University of Chicago found that ESG investing can lead to higher carbon emissions.
In conclusion, ESG investing is a disaster in the making. It is based on subjective criteria, it is expensive, it can be discriminatory, and it is ineffective. Investors should be wary of ESG investing and should instead focus on traditional, value-based investing.
Here are some additional arguments against ESG investing:
ESG investing can lead to lower returns. Studies have shown that ESG funds tend to underperform traditional funds.
ESG investing can be harmful to the environment. ESG funds may exclude companies that operate in certain industries, such as fossil fuels or agriculture. This can lead to higher prices for consumers and can make it more difficult for these companies to invest in new technologies that could reduce their environmental impact.
ESG investing can be used to greenwash companies. Companies may make false or misleading claims about their ESG credentials in order to attract investors. This can mislead consumers and can make it difficult to hold companies accountable for their environmental and social impacts.
Overall, there are a number of reasons to be skeptical of ESG investing. Investors should carefully consider the risks before investing in ESG funds.
NIST Graded Our Post-Quantum Cryptography. Zero Failures.
NIST's Algorithm Validation Test System generated test vectors nobody had seen, we answered them over the ACVP protocol, and NIST graded the result: 2,130 cases across ML-KEM, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA in every parameter set offered, zero failures, demo certificate A11025. This is what that proves, where we deliberately drew the claim narrower than NIST's own matrix, and why the FIPS 140-2 sunset on 21 September makes the distinction between being graded and grading yourself worth understanding.
The Problem Is Not the Problem
People treat the Jack Sparrow line as a joke. The attribution is a joke. The sentence is not. Forty years in markets says the same thing Epictetus said in 125 CE and Robert Merton named in 1948: the event is finite, and the story you appoint to govern it is not. This essay walks the quote back to its actual sources, draws the loop that turns a feeling into an order, and sets out the four places a rule written in advance cuts the loop. Faith is not a hedge. It is a stance.
What KXCO Is, and Why the Hard Problem Was Never Intelligence
The prevailing enthusiasm assumes the hard problem is intelligence. It is not. It is that banks, hospitals, courts and governments are being asked to let software act on their behalf with no way to establish who decided, on what basis, or whether the record will still read in a decade. KXCO founder Shayne Heffernan sets out the architecture that answers those questions, drawn as a graph, and argues that properly constructed AI is an amplifier of human judgement rather than a replacement for it.
AI Intelligence Scales. Accountability Does Not. Why KXCO Is Built for It.
Capability is becoming abundant and everything abundant gets cheap. What does not get cheap is the person who has to sign, and they can only carry what they can see. Four conditions follow from that, and four independent authorities reached the first of them last month without knowing it.
Every story, signed and delivered.
Subscribe to the kxco channel and get the headline, the AI-written key takeaways, and the chain-anchor link the moment we publish. Audio versions and per-ticker subscriptions arrive in the next iteration.