UN document reveals Y 2000 plan to push massive migration
Millions of migrants mostly from Africa and the Middle East have swarmed Europe in the last three years, the result of what has been explained by world leaders as a war-driven “refugee” crisis.
Yet, a United Nations document, prepared in Y 2000 and rediscovered by WND, reveals the UN was already promoting the notion of “replacement migration” in Europe with the support of open-borders non-governmental organizations and “progressive” politicians.
The document, “Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Aging Populations?” details the plunging birthrates across Europe and identifies a solution: mass immigration.
The 17-year-old document contended mass immigration was necessary to replace the aging populations of developed countries. Without the migration of populations from the developing world, it reasons, economies will suffer because of labor shortages and falling tax revenues.
“Therefore, among the demographic variables, only international migration could be instrumental in addressing population decline and population aging in the short to medium term,” the report concludes.
The report specifically targets the US, Germany, Britain, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea and Russia as prime candidates for replacement migration.
It is not an obscure study, written and then ignored, but a founding piece of the pro-migration agenda pushed by the United Nations, the US Chamber of Commerce and open-borders advocates.
“Following the publication of the draft of this study, the Population Division of the United Nations organized an Expert Group Meeting on ‘Policy Responses to Population Aging and Population Decline’ from 16 to 18 October 2000, at United Nations Headquarters in New York,” the report notes.
“Replacement migration was one among a number of possible policy responses that were considered.”
According to UN documents, the meeting was attended by a host of government and non-governmental organizations and individuals, and it featured numerous policy proposals in support of “replacement migration.”
Attendees included the International Organization for Migration, a U.N. group that recently declared that mass migration is not only “inevitable” but “necessary”; the U.N. Population Fund, a group dedicated to “family planning” and the spread of contraceptives; and the U.S. Census Bureau.
Among the invited experts were 2 Americans, Judith Treas, a sociologist at the University of California at Irvine, and Michael Teitelbaum, former Vice President of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Both experts concluded that a large increase in migration would not benefit the United States, though Ms. Treas noted that immigration already accounts for about 1-in-5 new Americans.
“Immigrants will not prevent the long-run aging of the population, except in the highly unlikely scenario of a ten-fold increase in annual immigration levels,” Ms. Treas said.
When writing about Europe, on the other hand, many experts supported “replacement migration.”
Veteran political commentator and former White House adviser Patrick Buchanan told WND the fact that the UN “signed on to a mass migration of Third World peoples to Europe and America, to replace the native populations, is consistent with its anti-Western ideology and comes as no surprise.”
“Not long after its birth, the UN came to be dominated by delegates, diplomats and staff among whose operative principles was that the West was guilty of historic crimes against humanity, and that justice demanded the endless transfer of the West’s illicitly acquired wealth to a Third World it had oppressed,” said Buchanan, a senior adviser to US Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan and a former presidential candidate.
“Resentment, envy and hatred of the West among intellectual circles at Turtle Bay (the UN) – often echoed within the West itself, needs to be resisted like a disease, if the West is to remain the Great Civilization it has been,” he told WND.
Former UN Ambassador Alan Keyes told WND he views the “replacement migration” plot as “a decisive existential threat.”
“Given our form of government, careless immigration policies actually exacerbate an attack on the sovereign body of the people, whom the US Constitution vests with ultimate human authority over the government it establishes, and the constitutional terms on which it is established,” he said.
Wednesday, at a Keynote to a gubernatorial forum in Minnesota, former Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann (R) warned that migration from Islamic countries is a vital threat to Western civilization.
“This is something that we have to be cognizant of, and not be afraid of it,” Rep Bachmann said.
“That’s what I see in Minnesota: too many people who are being afraid of being called racists, bigots, Islamophobes — I’m not afraid of it, because what we’ve got to do is talk about the truth of the problems that are going on in Minnesota.”
Rep. Bachmann said America should “step up deportation in the country of people who are unwilling to bear allegiance to the United States,” stop immigration from Muslim countries and prevent the creation of “parallel societies within our society.”
Ten years ago, when Europe’s demographic crisis was not as apparent as it is today, WND covered an international conference in Warsaw that warned of a coming “demographic winter” that posed an existential threat to Europe as the rejection of the “natural family” was leading to plunging birthrates and the consequent importation of millions of workers from countries with historic colonial ties who spurn Western values and refuse to assimilate.
More than 1.3-M migrants applied for refugee status in Europe in Y 2015, a record number for the continent, according to the Pew Research Center.
An estimated 75% of Europe’s asylum seekers in Y 2015 were young males, many without significant training or education. Among them were Gambian (97%), Pakistanis (95%), Afghanis (80% male), Iraqis (75% male) and Syrians (71% male).
Aydan Özouz, the German commissioner for immigration, refugees and integration, told the Financial Times that only 25% of recent migrants to Germany would find employment in the next 5 years.
“Many of the first Syrian refugees to arrive in Germany were doctors and engineers, but they were succeeded by many, many more who lacked skills,” Özouz said.
In Sweden, the government accepted 163,000 asylum seekers in Y 2015. A year later, only 500 of these migrants had found any work, according to the European English-language news site The Local.
The migrants cost the Swedish government millions of dollars in financial and housing benefits from the state.
In the Netherlands, 90% of Syrian and Eritrean asylum seekers who entered in recent years remain dependent on social benefits.
Almost none were employed after 18 months in the country, reports Wakker Nederland, a Dutch public broadcaster.
In addition, a high percentage of so-called asylum seekers are not refugees fleeing persecution or war but economic migrants seeking to move to Europe for financial benefit.
Only 2.65% of migrants who crossed the Mediterranean to Italy in Y 2016 were deemed refugees, according to a UN report. Out of 181,436 migrants, a mere 4,808 were granted asylum in Italy.
The same UN report notes that 90,334 of the migrants to Europe did not even request asylum. Instead, they entered into the black market economy immediately.
Many EU officials are no longer denying that fact, with one official claiming last month, “In most of the cases, and that is actually the case on the central Mediterranean route, we’re talking clearly and manifestly about economic migrants.”
European Council (EC) President Donald Tusk agrees with the assessment, concluding the current policy toward illegal immigration is “not enough.”
Some politicians in Europe are calling for a strict crackdown on illegal immigration, placing the blame for mass migration on NGOs as well as the complicity of the European Union (EU).
“You can’t any longer speak about immigration but about an invasion organized, funded and planned by Brussels with the complicity of Rome,” Matteo Salvini, the leader of Italy’s Northern League party, claimed in May.
Along with the EU, the United Nations has been a major proponent of migration to the European continent.
The UN’s New York Declaration on Migrants and Refugees, a document adopted by the General Assembly in Y 2016, demonstrates the continued support for migrants provided by the UN It includes provisions to “strongly condemn xenophobia against refugees and migrants and support a global campaign to counter it” as well as “strengthen the positive contributions made by migrants to economic and social development in their host countries.”
The UN’s views on migration are further outlined in a video created by the International Organization for Migration (IOM), a UN organization that provides services for migrants.
A UN propaganda video released in July declares: “Migration is INEVITABLE. Migration is NECESSARY. Migration is DESIRABLE.”
Watch UN video promoting mass migration as “necessary”:
Some believe the actions by the UN and NGOs are leading to what French writer Renaud Camus termed “the Great Replacement,” in which, over just a few generations, the names of places remain the same but the people and their values change.
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Strasbourg, Luc Ravel, recently stated in the French publication Valeurs Actuelles that France was undergoing such a replacement, pointing to the influx of Muslim immigrants and their high birth rates relative to the native population.
“Muslim believers know very well that their birthrate is such that today, they call it … the Great Replacement, they tell you in a very calm, very positive way that, ‘one day all this, it will be ours,’” said Bishop Ravel.
bishop Ravel and other critics on the right provide as further evidence of an engineered “Great Replacement,” the propensity of left-wing media and politicians to decry childbirth, promote abortion and simultaneously declare that migration is needed to raise birthrates, as evidenced in the following screenshots.
Paul Ebeling, Editor