Some Companies that ‘Inverted’ to Return US for the Trump Tax Cuts

Some Companies that ‘Inverted’ to Return US for the Trump Tax Cuts

Some Companies that ‘Inverted’ to Return US for the Trump Tax Cuts

Some of the US companies that moved offshore in a wave of inversion deals are now considering returning to the United States now that domestic tax rates are lower and tax policing is tougher abroad, attorneys and consultants said.

Some clients have asked about re-domestication, which could involve buying a US-HQ’d company, the tax advisers said.

No specific companies or deals were identified.

Uncertainties about US Republican President Donald Trump’s trade policies have also prompted the conversations, the advisers said.

“Inverted companies have reason to look at whether or not it still makes sense for them to be offshore, particularly those that manufacture product outside the U.S. and sell it back into the U.S.,” said a Washington-based tax expert at accounting and consulting group PwC.

A surge of homecomings would reverse an on-again, off-again trend since the 1980’s of US companies reincorporating overseas to cut tax costs.

In an inversion, a US company typically buys a smaller foreign firm in a lower-tax country and adopts the acquired firm’s headquarters.

That maneuver means the company does not have to pay US taxes on foreign income, even if its management and operations remain in the United States.

Trump’s public shaming of companies that move plants and jobs overseas has also made some consumer-focused firms rethink inversions, advisers said.

Executives at inverted companies see less tax “friction” under the new tax regime that would discourage redomiciling, advisers said, and have also mentioned the appeal of corporate-friendly, low-tax states and improved access to U.S. government contracts in the discussions.

More than 60 US companies have inverted. There was a wave of deals in Ys 2011-2014, but inversions largely ended in Y 2015.

The Trump Administration last month finalized and left in place the Hussein Obama-era rules.

The GOP tax overhaul signed into law in December eliminated a Key inversion incentive by slashing the US corporate rate to 21 from 35% and altering how foreign profits are taxed.

A push to prevent profit-shifting strategies and corporate tax base erosion across the 36-nation Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is also making foreign tax domiciles marginally less attractive, especially in Europe.

Tax advisers said it is still possible to structure lower tax rates in countries such as Ireland and the Netherlands.

How the US Treasury implements parts of the new tax law will help determine whether companies return to the United States.

A new tax on Global Intangible Low Taxed Income, or GILTI, on its face imposes a 10.5% tax rate. But because the bill is poorly worded, it can result in rates of 15% or more due to unfavorable effects on foreign tax credits.

GILTI’s implementation could influence tax-base decisions among companies re-domiciled in Britain, which may consider whether to relocate to the United States or other countries to avoid the effects of BREXIT.

Redomiciling to the United States is a case-by-case decision.

“It really is a modeling exercise to determine whether it’s more beneficial being a U.S.-based company versus a foreign-based company.”

America First and MAGA + Keep America Great

 

The following two tabs change content below.

Paul Ebeling

Paul A. Ebeling, polymath, excels in diverse fields of knowledge. Pattern Recognition Analyst in Equities, Commodities and Foreign Exchange and author of “The Red Roadmaster’s Technical Report” on the US Major Market Indices™, a highly regarded, weekly financial market letter, he is also a philosopher, issuing insights on a wide range of subjects to a following of over 250,000 cohorts. An international audience of opinion makers, business leaders, and global organizations recognizes Ebeling as an expert.

You must be logged in to post comments :  
CONNECT WITH