$GLD, $SLV, $XAU, $XAG, $USD, $MSFT
By Mark J. Lundeen
Ah, talk about great market action, from here it should be easy for the DJIA to make a new BEV Zero in the Bear’s Eye View chart below. But I do not get a sense of urgency on the part of the Bulls, yet.
Looking at the Dow Jones in the daily bar chart below, market action again looks good. I know the stock market does best with low volatility, but seeing the Dow Jones so close to making history, advancing with such pathetic small daily steps is boring me to death.
Come on, the Dow Jones is making history again. One would expect a little excitement from the bulls in the stock market, but it’s not there. It’s almost as if trading is dominated by robot traders programmed by the big Wall Street firms.
I wonder just how much public participation is in this market?
It’s a safe bet public participation in today’s bull market is far below where it was in the 1990s, and again before the 2007-09 credit crisis. After those two bubbles deflated, they greatly deflated the capital accounts of the general population that used to buy and sell the stocks trading on Wall Street. That plus having to endure two massive bear markets in less than a decade, the 2000 to 2002 78% bear market in the NASDAQ composite and the 2007 to 2009 54% bear market in the Dow Jones brutalized the bulls.
Wall Street itself is not looking too good either, as seen in the Zero Hedge article below on the Russell 2000 stocks. It all comes back to an unpleasant fact that the Federal Reserve has “injected” too much “liquidity” into the financial system. When this “liquidity” is ingested by corporations, it metabolizes into insupportable liabilities on their balance sheets, where debt service for all too many companies today absorbs their profitability.
It’s not just Illinois and Chicago; most of the big block-buster states in the Electoral College have spent more than they can pay back. At some point, a shock wave of defaults is going to spread terror in the debt markets.
Every now and then I receive comments on how the Federal Reserve System can support low bond yields indefinitely. Well yes they can, as long as the issuers of those bonds continue servicing their interest and principle payments. Whether the FOMC can maintain low yields as bond defaults roll across America is another thing entirely, and the day is coming when we’ll come to that point in the municipal and corporate bond markets.
At first fiduciaries and money managers will most likely “seek the safety” of the Treasury Bond market, as everyone knows Uncle Sam can’t go broke. He has the printing press making all the dollars he needs to pay his bills you know! Unfortunately, the dollars the Treasury’s debts are denominated in are backed only by the Full Faith and Credit of the United States Government. In other words, they are only accepted as payment for goods and services in the economy because the financial system has confidence in them. You can count on Mr Bear targeting confidence in the US Dollar as a high priority target in his pending bear market.
Which brings us to gold’s BEV chart below; so how does gold look at the close of this week? Gold is seeing a bit of a correction from its advance of September 2018 to January this year. Nothing to be worried about as it prepares for its fifth assault on its BEV -27.5% line ($1360) since 2013.
Gold and its step sum remain attractive, and hopefully ready for a break out sometime this year. Studying gold’s price plot (Blue Plot) below, when gold peaked in August 2011 to its December 2015 bear market bottom, the bears had their way with the bulls. However, after four years of that the bears have become a spent force in the market allowing the bulls to advance the price of gold for the past 3 years. When the bulls once again begin charging up the hill, they should take out their old all-time high of August 2011 without much trouble.
But before the bull market in gold, silver and the mining shares become obvious to all, I still believe we’ll need volatility in the stock and precious metals markets to increase dramatically. In other words these markets need to once again see days of extreme volatility on a regular basis.
For the Dow Jones that means for it to once again see regular daily moves of 2% or more. Of course this would be very bearish for the stock market, but it’s deflation in the financial markets that sends flight capital into the old monetary metals. When this capital flight arrives in the gold and silver markets, we’ll see frequent daily moves of 3% or more in gold, and 5% daily moves is the magic number for silver.
Until these markets once again become volatile markets, I’m expecting more of the same boring market action we’ve seen in the past few months.
The Dow Jones and its step sum are seen below. The Dow’s step sum hasn’t moved much since early February, yet the Dow Jones itself continues to advance. That’s good market action. Now if the Dow Jones can manage to close above 26,858 next week, we’ll once again find it making market history.
In the past few weeks gold has seen more declining than advancing days in its step sum table below, yet it has held on to its valuation. Then this week the price of gold slipped a bit. What that means for next week I haven’t a clue. Maybe the price of gold continues slipping down, or it could begin its assault on $1360, and then next week closing price may be near this week’s. In any case I remain a long-term bull on gold and silver.
The Dow Jones is seeing more advancing than declining days in the table above, and it’s using these net advancing days to advance in price. But as noted above, unlike 1999 and again in 2007, there is no sense of urgency for the Dow Jones to once again close at new all-time highs, making this one boring market to comment on.
I’ve been following the Gold Antitrust Action Committee’s (GATA) Bill Murphy and Chris Powell since the late 1990s. After their twenty-plus years of struggle, if Bill and Chris have one sore spot, it’s that certain people who should be GATA’s natural allies in their war on price manipulation in the gold and silver markets (mining company executives & pro-gold market experts) have chosen to remain silent, or have shown GATA serious disrespect.
Exactly why these people have chosen to remain silent I can’t say, but I suspect it’s because they fear the consequences to themselves, their families and their employees should they speak out.
Seeing how President Trump and members of his 2016 presidential campaign have been wrongly abused by the entrenched and very corrupt bureaucracy in the Justice Department, as the FAKE NEWS MEDIA cheered them on for the past two years, has enlightened me on how Washington actually works.
Special Prosecutor Mueller’s final report on his investigation of President Trump’s alleged Russian entanglement came out and has failed to do any damage to his Presidency.
In fact, it’s just the opposite; it’s made the President stronger and much angrier at those who actually committed treason in their attempt to remove him from office by all means at their disposal, and treason is a hanging offence.
Returning to the precious metals markets
GATA’s problems with the gold and silver markets are much more than just what some people will or won’t say to the public. When GATA first went public in 1998, central banks were net sellers of gold. As the entire world was fixed on the ever rising high-tech NASDAQ Composite Index, gold appeared to be an antiquated monetary asset. In the 1990’s central bankers actually complained about their burden of holding and guarding what at the time was described as a “dead asset” that paid no interest to its owners.
The following quote by Warren Buffett from the 1990’s sums up most people’s opinion on gold as it deflated towards its 20-year bear market bottom in July 1999.
“We dig gold out of the ground, then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again and pay people to stand around guarding it. It has no utility. Anyone watching from Mars would be scratching their head,”–Warren Buffett
So, from the mid-1980’s to 2000, central banks were more than willing to lend Wall Street their gold by the tonnage to receive a 2% rate of return. The big banks used this gold for leasing to mining companies to finance resource development and to speculators who sold in the open market to drive down the price of gold at the tail-end of the 1980-2001 bear market.
“Central banks stand ready to lease gold in increasing quantities should the price rise.”- Alan Greenspan, 24 July 1998 Congressional Testimony
Most of this gold (monetary gold leased to Wall Street decades ago) is now gone and will never be returned to its central bank owners. But what a difference twenty years makes! Today in 2019, central banks now stand first in line to purchase as much gold as they can within the confines of the gold market’s limited supply.
I also note commentary on gold and silver in the MSM is muted these days. The Financial News Media on balance isn’t for or against gold; rather they’re ignoring it. The truth is the MSM is a member of the establishment just as much as the Federal Reserve is. I wouldn’t doubt it if the MSM is attempting to keep public interest in gold and silver at a minimum as the world’s central banks purchase as much gold as they can at today’s subsidized low prices.
In time the public will once again desire to own gold. Whenever that day comes, the public will be shocked at how little gold and silver was left to them by the central banking cartel. And when that day arises the price of gold and silver the public will have to pay won’t be subsidized, as it is now. Which is an excellent reason to believe the gold and silver miners will once again provide the public with a superb proxy for precious metals in a gold and silver bull market.
The silver to gold ratio (SGR) is the number of ounces of silver an ounce of gold can be traded for. More frequently the SGR is called the gold to silver ratio; why I don’t know as that is neither grammatically or mathematically correct, but as long as everyone knows it’s a ratio of silver to gold, no harm is done.
Before gold was demonetized in 1971, and silver kicked out of the monetary system in 1964, a long, long time ago the SGR was fixed by law. I know pre 1934 gold was fixed at $20.67 per ounce of gold, and an American $20 double eagle coin wasn’t exactly 1 ounce of gold, but for this example let’s state as a fact that before 1934 a $20 gold piece could be exchanged for 20 silver dollars, because it could.
This was so as the value of any coin then in circulation was fixed by the content of gold or silver it contained. The pre 1934 SGR of 20:1 was fixed by the approximate ratio of silver to gold found in nature as mining companies mined money from the ground. This ratio could vary significantly from one ore deposit to another and even from year to year for any particular ore body. But at some point a decision must be made to how many ounce of silvers (silver dollars) is to be equivalent to a single$20 gold piece, and that was fixed at 20.
Below is a plot of the SGR going back to January 1957, to this week’s close. Before 1968 the ratio was bounded between 20 and 40 ounces of silver to one ounce of gold. Note that 1957 was the year a run on the US Treasury’s gold reserves began that didn’t end until August 1971. Currency in Circulation in 1957 was $31.8 billion. In December 1968 CinC increased to $50 billion dollars, an eleven year, 57% increase in CinC. Seeing the SGR cut in half, from 40 to below 20 during this period shows the price of silver more than doubled during this run on the US Treasury’s gold reserves, from $0.91 to $1.98 an ounce.
After August 1971, when the US Treasury decoupled the dollar from gold, allowing Washington to issue paper dollars unchecked by a metal monetary standard, it didn’t take long for this ratio to shift up above 30.
Since 1984, the SGR has in the main traded between 40 to 80 ounces of silver to one ounce of gold, and in doing so what is the SGR telling us? Other than the global monetary system was hijacked by monetary maniacs, I can’t really say. But two things can be said with certainty:
· Declines in the SGR from 80 are periods of advancing gold and silver prices. Advances up to 80 are periods of declining gold and silver prices.
· SGRs of >80 are market extremes, as in extremely cheap silver prices.
The SGR chart above uses weekly closing data, but I have daily data going back to 1969 in another file, which I used to construct the frequency distribution table below. I began the table in January 1994 as going back any further seemed pointless.
Looking at row 85 of the SGR table below, which includes all the SGRs from >85 down to 80.01 from January 1994 to this week’s close, we see 263 daily closes in the past 25 years in this row. Looking at the SGR chart above (post January 1994) seeing the SGR at 80 or above is a market extreme that the market doesn’t long tolerate. So it’s interesting that of these 263 daily closings, 218 of them have occurred since February 2018, within the last year.
Also, the highest SGR values since January 1994 occurred earlier this month with April 11th’s SGR close of 86.36. I should note my gold and silver prices may not be the same as yours, as my source doesn’t provide COMEX closing prices, but the price of gold and silver at 10PM central time, as that’s when I download my data. Nonetheless, the SGR for the past year has been at a market extreme that from one day to the next has refused to decline below 80 for now well over a year.
What does all this mean?
Clearly something got stuck in the precious metals markets. What happens when the SGR once again breaks far below its current value of 80 is something I’m looking forward to. Before that happens, I expect we’ll have to wait a bit longer as the central-bank cartel attempts to replenish their reserves of gold they squandered decades ago.
Is there is any doubt in your mind of what kind of world we live in?
I can tell you right now – we live in a very dark world where our elite class sees the world they control, the one we live in, through a Darwinian lens of the survival of the fittest; where the weak are the natural prey of the strong.
Think I’m wrong?
Here is a video from China Uncensored on how Microsoft, and many other American high-tech companies are, for a share of the Chinese market place, more than willing to suppress the Chinese population for the benefit of the Chinese Communist Party.
I remember back in the 1980’s when people like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates were celebrated as something new in computing; nothing like the hated old guard computing companies like IBM who would do anything for money. This Apple Computer commercial from the 1984 Super Bowl really catches the spirit of the PC revolution of a few decades ago.
As it turned out, the new masters of the digital domain are just like the old ones, except the power of 21st Century technology is taking us to a nightmare world.
How the Communist Chinese Party wants to manage their captive population is no different than what the EU, the United States, and all other governments want to do with theirs. They want to know everything, and control everything.
Silicon Valley is also finding ways for computers to tap into people’s minds to capture their thoughts. In time computer science will perfect this technique, and governments WILL USE IT, as the MSM cheers this advancement of technology to monitor the criminal intentions within their population, stopping crime before criminals have the opportunity to break the law.
In a secular Darwinian society, there will be no greater crime than opposing those who know best.
Paul Ebeling, Editor