Mother of Activist Democrat Accuser of Judge Roy Moore Disputes Daughter’s Claims
The mother of Leigh Corfman, who says that Alabama Senatorial Candidate Judge Roy Moore tried to engage in a sexual encounter with her when she was 14 anni, has contradicted a Key detail of Ms. Corfman’s story.
Speaking by phone to Breitbart News on Saturday, Ms. Corfman’s mother, Nancy Wells, 71 anni, says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the period that Judge Moore is reported to have allegedly called Ms. Corfman on her bedroom phone to arrange at least 1 encounter.
Judge Moore strongly denies Ms. Corfman’s claims.
The WP, which 1st published its newsmaking, on-the-record interview with Democratic activist Corfman last week, cited Ms. Corfman as remembering that she provided Judge Moore with her number when she was 14 anni.
She said that she spoke to Judge Moore from what she described as the phone in her bedroom.
Citing Ms. Corfman, the WP reported: After her mother went into the courtroom, Ms. Corfman says, Jusge Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house.
Soon after, Ms. Corfman said, he called again, and picked her up again at the same spot.
Later on, Ms. Corfman described a 3rd phone call: She says that after their last encounter, Judge Moore called again, but that she found an excuse to avoid seeing him. She says that at some point during or soon after her meetings with Judge Moore, she told 2 friends in vague terms that she was seeing an older man.
Ms. Corfman clearly claimed she spoke to Judge Moore on what she said was “her phone in her bedroom” on at least 1 of those occasions. The WP did not specify whether the 2nd or 3rd alleged calls purportedly took place on a bedroom phone.
Mrs. Wells, Ms. Corfman’s mother, was asked by Breitbart News: “Back then did she have her own phone in her room or something?”
“No,” she replied matter-of-factly. “But the phone in the house could get through to her easily.”
The WP story relies heavily on Ms. Corfman’s memory and her ability to recount events consistently.
The newspaper reported that “Corfman described her story consistently in 6 interviews with The Post.”
The WP story uses the word “remembers” 10X when quoting or paraphrasing Ms. Corfman.
Here are those 10Xs as follows:
1: The WP cited Corfman thusly: “’I wanted it over with — I wanted out,’ she remembers thinking.”
This detail related to Corfman’s claim that Moore drove her to his house, removed his own clothes besides his underwear, took off her shirt and guided her hand to his underwear.
2: During the initial alleged encounter, when Corfman said that Moore was watching her while Corfman’s mother went into the courtroom, the WP reported, “She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after.”
3: “I remember the further I got from my house, the more nervous I got,” Corfman was quoted as saying when she recalled the alleged drive with Moore from her house.
5 – 7: The Post used the word three times when citing Corfman in the following paragraph:
She remembers an unpaved driveway. She remembers going inside and him giving her alcohol on this visit or the next, and that at some point she told him she was 14. She says they sat and talked. She remembers that Moore told her she was pretty, put his arm around her and kissed her, and that she began to feel nervous and asked him to take her home, which she says he did.
8 – Referring to the alleged sexual encounter, the Post reported:
She remembers that Moore kissed her, that he took off her pants and shirt, and that he touched her through her bra and underpants. She says that he guided her hand to his underwear and that she yanked her hand back.
9 – In that same encounter, the Post relates:
She remembers thinking, “I don’t want to do this” and “I need to get out of here.” She says that she got dressed and asked Moore to take her home, and that he did.
Meanwhile, Mrs. Wells was sked if she could remember Judge Moore, then a 32-year-old assistant District Attorney, allegedly asking to watch her daughter in Y 1979 while Wells went into a courtroom, Wells recounted the story essentially the same way she told it to the WP.
Mrs. Wells told this reporter: “We were sitting in the hall. He came up and started talking to us. We were sitting on a bench waiting to go into court. He said, you know, ‘What are you doing.’ You know, we told him. He is Roy Moore. And he said, ‘You don’t want her to go in there and hear all of the bickering.’ And I said, ‘No.’ He said, ‘I will be glad to stay out here with her and bring her in if she needs to come in.’ And so that is the way it started.”
“Probably if it were in today’s times that never would have happened,” Mrs. Wells added. “He sounded like someone that I could trust and we were there in the courthouse.”
Ms. Corfman described her own troubled background to the WP, including 3 divorces, bankruptcies and a history of drug abuse.
The WP related: She says that her teenage life became increasingly reckless with drinking, drugs, boyfriends, and a suicide attempt when she was 16.
As the years went on, Ms. Corfman says, she did not share her story about Judge Moore partly because of the trouble in her life. She has had 3 divorces and financial problems. While living in Arizona, she and her 2nd husband started a screen-printing business that fell into debt. They filed for bankruptcy protection 3 times, once in 1991 with $139,689 in unpaid claims brought by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other creditors, according to court records.
Judge Moore strongly denied Ms. Corfman’s claims. “These allegations are completely false and are a desperate political attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this campaign,” Judge Moore said in immediate response to the WP’s story.
Judge Moore’s Senate campaign said in a statement, “This garbage is the very definition of fake news and intentional defamation.”
The campaign pointed out that Judge Moore has been married to his wife, Kayla, for nearly 33 years and has 4 children and 5 grandchildren. It also noted that Judge Moore has served in public office in the past and that no such allegations were previously made.
The statement said: The Judge has been a candidate in 4 hotly-contested statewide political contests, twice as a gubernatorial candidate and 2X as a candidate for Chief Justice. He has been a 3X candidate for local office, and he has been a national figure in 2 ground-breaking, judicial fights over religious liberty and traditional marriage.
“After over 40 years of public service, if any of these allegations were true, they surely would have been made public long before now,” the statement continued.
On Saturday, Judge Moore further addressed the allegations: “Now I want to address something that some people have come here to hear about,” he said at a local campaign event. “Shortly after becoming the Republican nominee for the United States Senate, the Washington Post began an attack on the Foundation for Moral Law, on my wife, and on me. For weeks, we read about my salary which they distorted, about taxes where they said we were paid money we never got. But we endured that.”
“Later, they came out and endorsed my opponent in this race,” he continued. “Just 2 days ago, the Washington Post published yet another attack on my character and reputation in a desperate attempt to stop my political campaign for the United States Senate. These attacks about a minor are completely false and untrue about something that happened nearly 40 years ago. But more than being completely false and untrue, they are very hurtful to me personally.”
“I wanted to make it clear to the media present and the people present, I have not provided alcoholic beverages—beer or anything else—to a minor. I have not been guilty of sexual misconduct with anyone,” he declared. “These allegations came only four and a half weeks before the general election on Dec. 12. Why now?”
“For 40 years I have been closely scrutinized in the press and the public media. I have had investigations by the attorney general, I’ve had investigations by the judicial inquiry commission on more than one occasion, I’ve had investigations by the court of the judiciary, I’ve been in five statewide campaigns in which they do opposition research—they do investigations, as you can see in every one I’ve ever run—and three county elections and two major controversies over religious liberty and the Ten Commandments and same-sex marriage,” he continued. “I’ve been investigated more than any other person in this country. That grown women would wait forty years to come right before an election to bring charges is absolutely unbelievable.”
By Aaron Klein
Paul Ebeling, Editor
Latest posts by Paul Ebeling (see all)
- The Street’s Key Stock Analysts Research Reports - September 23, 2019
- Asia: Gold, Crude Oil, Stocks, Commodities and Currency Pairs - September 23, 2019
- Commentary: Paul Ebeling on Wall Street - September 23, 2019