Fed Should Read Market, Cut Rates Now

Fed Should Read Market, Cut Rates Now

Economist and author Art Laffer, the architect behind the Reagan tax cuts that ushered in an era of economic prosperity for a generation, said the Federal Reserve should read market signs of falling bond yields and lower short-term interest rates and slash short-term interest rates.

The bond market is signaling an increasing likelihood of the next Fed move being a reduction in the cost of borrowing money.

“I do think it’s in the cards,” says Mr. Laffer, formerly an economic adviser to Presidents Trump and Ronald Reagan.

“The Fed has always followed interest rates [in the bond market] not led them,” Mr. Laffer said.

“I think the chance of a lowering is quite high,” said Mr Laffer, known for the Laffer Curve, a theory that basically argues that increasing tax rates beyond a certain point becomes counter-productive for raising tax revenue.

Mr. Laffer believes the Fed should not be worried about stoking persistently low inflation by allowing the economy to continue to grow unfettered.

“You can have a very strong economy with low interest rates,” said Laffer, co-author of “Trumponomics: Inside the America First Plan to Revive Our Economy.”

Meanwhile, cool inflation and a hot jobs market are putting the Federal Reserve’s policy goals at odds, but there is “no clarion call” to push interest rates either way as trade risks lurk, a top policymaker said Tuesday.

“Today, the 2 elements of the Fed’s mandate are sending opposing signals for monetary policy, with low unemployment perhaps suggesting a bit tighter policy, and low inflation the opposite,” Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said in remarks prepared for delivery to the Economic Club of New York.

Mr. Rosengren, 1 of 10 people who vote on the Fed’s rate-setting panel this year, said rates are a bit easy and can, along with a tight job market, revive inflation that might have declined only temporarily.

He said a trade conflict between the US and China, which could cut growth or raise prices is all the more reason to keep rates on hold.

Even before the trade dispute happened, markets increasingly bet policymakers would cut rates to bring inflation up to its 2%-a-year target. But Fed policymakers want to maintain the option of raising rates if wages or other prices rise or if markets get frothy.

Making and Keeping America Great!

The following two tabs change content below.

Paul Ebeling

Paul A. Ebeling, polymath, excels in diverse fields of knowledge. Pattern Recognition Analyst in Equities, Commodities and Foreign Exchange and author of “The Red Roadmaster’s Technical Report” on the US Major Market Indices™, a highly regarded, weekly financial market letter, he is also a philosopher, issuing insights on a wide range of subjects to a following of over 250,000 cohorts. An international audience of opinion makers, business leaders, and global organizations recognizes Ebeling as an expert.

Latest posts by Paul Ebeling (see all)

You must be logged in to post comments :