Expect Supreme Court to Uphold President Trump’s Travel Ban
Federal judges in Maryland and Hawaii who blocked US President Donald Trump’s revised travel ban overstepped their bounds by using his campaign rhetoric to justify their rulings, so expect the Supreme Court will uphold the ban.
“I’m putting my reputation on the line,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said Saturday morning in a TV interview. “I predict if the case gets to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court will uphold the major provisions of this ban.”
“Focusing so heavily on campaign rhetoric and essentially saying, ‘look, if Obama had issued the very same order with it would be constitutional, but if Trump issues it it’s unconstitutional because he said some things about Muslims in the run-up to the campaign or Rudy Giuliani said some things and other people said some things,’ that’s not the way the law is supposed to operate,” he said.
Professor Dershowitz said he believes the Justice Department under President Trump is “getting smart,” as it is not filing its appeals to the Ninth Circuit court district, where it will likely get an adverse ruling, but to the Fourth Circuit, a “much more conservative court” that would be more likely to uphold the travel ban.
And if the case makes it to the Supreme Court, president Trump will likely win his case, as the vote would be split 4-4, said Prof. Dershowitz.
“There is precedent in extreme cases, where legislators in an in enacting a statute say things that you can look to the legislative intent,” said Prof. Dershowitz. “I have never heard of a case where the rhetoric of a candidate, ambiguous rhetoric to be sure.”
He also said he does not believe the ban is a Muslim ban, but rather focuses on countries like Iran, “the greatest exporter of terrorism.”
“Not only no vetting, but it sends terrorists out in order to kill Americans,” he said. “Iran has so much blood on its hands of Americans and American allies, to exclude a country like Iran from the list would be absurd.”
The list of countries that are excluded came from President Barack Hussein-Obama originally, so “how can you say that the inclusion of the six countries on the list was motivated by what Mr. Trump said when he was candidate Trump? That is just not good legal analysis.”
Also, Professor Dershowitz Saturday responded to comments made by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for The New York Times Magazine about the future of the Democratic Party.
In the article, he says there are some in the party who want to maintain the status quo and that “they would rather go down with the Titanic so long as they have 1st-Class seats.”
The party does not stand for Bernie Sanders.
“Sanders was never a Democrat,” he said.”He was a Socialist. He is not the mainstream of the Democratic Party. And if the Democratic Party moves left towards Sanders, toward Keith Ellison, it’s doomed.”
Instead, the party needs to regain support from Middle America in the Rust Belt states, said Professor Dershowitz, and he’d refer to the states not as the “status quo” but as the “vibrant center.”
“I want to return America to the center where good conservatives and good liberals, centrists, can argue with each other and get the radicals, the extreme leftists like Sanders marginalized along with the extreme rightist like the alt right,” he said.”Let’s bring the debate back to the center.”
Have a terrific weekend
Latest posts by Paul Ebeling (see all)
- The Street’s Key Stock Analysts Research Report - December 6, 2019
- The Gold Rally Stalled… - December 6, 2019
- Ferrari’s (NYSE:RACE) CEO has Plans to Revive Ferrari’s F1 Fortunes - December 5, 2019