Chemical in California’s Wildfire Smoke a Major Health Hazard
Smoke masks, eye drops, no outdoor exercise, staying indoors is how Californians are trying to cope with wildfires choking the state.
Experts say an increase in serious health problems are almost inevitable for vulnerable residents as the disasters become more commonplace.
Research suggests children, the elderly and those with existing health problems are most at risk.
Short-term exposure to wildfire smoke can worsen existing asthma and lung disease, leading to emergency room treatment or hospitalization, studies have shown.
Increases in doctor visits or hospital treatment for respiratory infections, bronchitis and pneumonia in otherwise healthy people also have been found during and after wildfires.
Some studies also have found increases in ER visits for heart attacks and strokes in people with existing heart disease on heavy smoke days during previous California wildfires, echoing research on potential risks from urban air pollution.
For most healthy people, exposure to wildfire smoke is an annoyance, causing burning eyes, scratchy throats or chest discomfort that all disappear when the smoke clears.
But doctors, scientists and public health officials are concerned that the changing face of wildfires will pose a much broader health hazard.
“Wildfire season used to be June to late September. Now it seems to be happening all year round. We need to be adapting to that,” Dr. Wayne Cascio, a US Environmental Protection Agency cardiologist, said this week.
In an overview published earlier this year, Dr. Cascio wrote that the increasing frequency of large wild-land fires, urban expansion into wooded areas and an aging population are all increasing the number of people at risk for health problems from fires.
Wood smoke contains some of the same toxic chemicals as urban air pollution, along with tiny particles of vapor and soot 30X thinner than a human hair. These can infiltrate the bloodstream, potentially causing inflammation and blood vessel damage even in healthy people, research on urban air pollution has shown. Studies have linked heart attacks and cancer with long-term exposure to air pollution.
Whether exposure to wildfire smoke carries the same risks is uncertain, and determining harm from smog versus wildfire smoke can be tricky, especially with wind-swept California wildfires spreading thick smoke hundreds of miles away into smoggy big cities.
“That is the big question,” said Dr. John Balmes, a University of California, San Francisco, professor of medicine who studies air pollution.
“Very little is known about the long-term effects of wildfire smoke because it’s hard to study populations years after a wildfire,” Dr. Balmes said.
Decreased lung function has been found in healthy firefighters during fire season. They tend to recover but federal legislation signed this year will establish a US registry tracking firefighters and potential risks for various cancers, including lung cancer, prior studies suggested a risk.
Regular folks breathing in all that smoke worry about the risks too.
Smoke from the fire that decimated the Northern California city of Paradise darkened skies this week in San Francisco, nearly 200 miles southwest.
The smoke was so thick in San Francisco, the skyline was barely visible from across the Bay. The city’s iconic open-air cable cars that are popular with tourists were pulled off the streets Thursday because of the bad air.
An Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) website said air quality in Sacramento was “hazardous” Thursday and San Francisco’s was “very unhealthy.” Many people walking around the cities wore face masks.
Most schools in San Francisco, Sacramento, Oakland and Folsom said they would be closed Friday. At least six universities in Northern California canceled classes Thursday.
Smoke has been so thick in Santa Rosa that researchers postponed a door-to-door survey there for a study of health effects of last year’s fires.
The study includes an online survey of households affected by last year’s fire, with responses from about 6,000 people so far.
Preliminary data show widespread respiratory problems, eye irritations, anxiety, depression and sleep problems around the time of the fire and months later.
Conventional thinking is that these effects related to fires are transient, now it is not clear that’s the case.
Researchers also will be analyzing cord blood and placentas collected from a few dozen women who were pregnant during the fire, seeking evidence of stress markers or exposure to smoke chemicals.
They hope to continue the study for years, seeking evidence of long-term physical and emotional harms to fire evacuees and their children
Latest posts by Paul Ebeling (see all)
- Little Known Travel Destinations in Japan - May 26, 2019
- Indy 500 2019: Results, Top Finishers and Analysis from 103rd Edition of Race - May 26, 2019
- Study: A Poor Diet Adds to Risk of Cancer - May 26, 2019