Google’s legal structure in China will allow the company to continue operations even if it closes its local search engine, local employees, industry and legal experts say. The comments come on speculation that Google is on the verge of carrying out its January threat to retreat partly or fully from China.

The company operates google.cn, its China-registered website, under a joint venture with a domestic partner because Chinese law bars foreign investors from holding controlling stakes in the Internet content business. But most of Google’s workforce in the country is employed by a separate company wholly owned by the US parent. “Research and development staff all work with us,” said an employee at Google Information Technology (China), a wholly foreign-owned company according to the Beijing Administration for Industry and Commerce.

Another employee in sales said most of Google’s sales force in China were also employed by the same company and not by Beijing Guxiang Information Technology, the J-V. “They have their R&D firewalled off, so they can continue to keep those people at work even if google.cn closes down,” said Duncan Clark, chairman of BDA, a Beijing-based telecoms and media consultancy.

Speculation about an imminent announcement from Google continued Friday. A state-owned newspaper, quoting an unnamed employee, reported that the company could make an announcement as early as Monday on closing google.cn. Eric Schmidt, Google chief executive, said earlier that the company would seek to keep some of its operations in the country.

Last week, a person familiar with the situation said Google had drawn up detailed plans for the closure of the Chinese search engine and hoped to manage an orderly exit. But negotiations with the Chinese government had not brought any breakthrough.

Google said it had more than 600 employees in China, half in research and development and the other half in sales.

Closing a joint venture in China can take months or even years because the law requires a range of audits including tax and customs issues, according to corporate lawyers.—Paul A. Ebeling, Jnr. www.livetradingnews.com

Posted by Shayne Heffernan on Mar 22nd, 2010and filed underBRIC, Latest News, USA.You can follow any responses to this entry through theRSS 2.0You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site