Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) banned all of its partners from making campaign contributions to state and local candidates running for office, as well as state or local officials running for federal office.
As of 1 September every partner is considered a “restricted person” prohibited from engaging in political activities or making campaign gifts to those candidates or officials, according to a 29 August internal “Memo” sent to partners.
“The policy change is meant to prevent inadvertently violating pay-to-play rules, particularly the look-back provision, when partners transition into roles covered by these rules,” the firm said in the memo, reported early Tuesday. “The penalties for failing to comply with these rules can be severe and include fines and a ban on the firm from doing business with government clients in a particular jurisdiction for a period of at least two years.”
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enacted the pay-to-play rule in Y 2010 after a series of scandals involving money managers accused of trying to improperly influence state officials to win investment-management business. Some of that influence included arranging political contributions.
This year, the rule extends to the Presidential race since Republican nominee Donald Trump chose Indiana Governor Mike Pence, a sitting state official, as his running mate.
Goldman Sachs requires all employees to get approval for proposed political contributions, according to a corporate governance statement, to screen for possible violations.
This new policy is designed to minimize damage to Goldman Sachs’s reputation that could be caused by “any false perception that the firm is attempting to circumvent pay-to-play rules, particularly given partners’ seniority and visibility,” according to the memo.
Goldman Sachs is not a stranger to controversy when it comes to pay-to-play rules.
In Y 2013, a former investment banker agreed to be barred from the securities industry for 5 years and pay $100,000 to resolve US claims that he made improper contributions to the Treasurer of Massachusetts at the same time he was seeking state underwriting business. Goldman Sachs agreed to pay $14.4-M.
Latest posts by Paul Ebeling (see all)
- The Outlook for American Businesses is Grim - October 21, 2016
- Majority of American Voters, “Hillary Clinton Should Have Been Indicted” - October 21, 2016
- To Slow the Aging Process Stopping Eating All the Time - October 21, 2016